was held yesterday in the city of Alcaniz-plenary debate on the state of our city. I wish that this column reflect the main findings of the debate, but have called it for 19:30, Thursday afternoon I facilitated the work of face to make our assessments of that right. As these lines a summary of the actions of different political forces represented in this Hall.
But I do not think you need to know what our Councillors have grounds to realize the different views that have the councilors of different political groups. Some extreme positions and to some extent irreconcilable been entrenched along an entire legislature. Where the opposition has failed to reach agreement with the government and the government has sought the support of the opposition. I am convinced that
Alcañiz to IU and PSOE is a bucolic town where everything works perfectly, where they have solved all the problems Alcañizanos, with reference city participatory, social and economic in Aragon. As an economic good as saying in an ironic sense, I suppose I understand.
PAR and PP for the city have become a devastated city where the Red in the city government has destroyed the values \u200b\u200bof living together and meaningless indebted to the session. IU and PSOE opposition parties have been guilty of lack of development of our city.
Nothing new under the sun. I just hope that the debate has been moved suggestions for improvements to the city, but not for this term to the next. That the debate has started talking in key future and not only passed key.
Because people spend but parties should be. The ideological line of each of them must be what it would strengthen the town of Alcaniz. Should move away from the fighting over personal than ideological. In a difficult financial situation within a complex socio-economic situation should generate ideas rather than political bitterness much with so little visibility. Something
utopians are my thoughts. Utopian in the same models as the city that all parties have submitted to the debate. It takes more common sense.
But I do not think you need to know what our Councillors have grounds to realize the different views that have the councilors of different political groups. Some extreme positions and to some extent irreconcilable been entrenched along an entire legislature. Where the opposition has failed to reach agreement with the government and the government has sought the support of the opposition. I am convinced that
Alcañiz to IU and PSOE is a bucolic town where everything works perfectly, where they have solved all the problems Alcañizanos, with reference city participatory, social and economic in Aragon. As an economic good as saying in an ironic sense, I suppose I understand.
PAR and PP for the city have become a devastated city where the Red in the city government has destroyed the values \u200b\u200bof living together and meaningless indebted to the session. IU and PSOE opposition parties have been guilty of lack of development of our city.
Nothing new under the sun. I just hope that the debate has been moved suggestions for improvements to the city, but not for this term to the next. That the debate has started talking in key future and not only passed key.
Because people spend but parties should be. The ideological line of each of them must be what it would strengthen the town of Alcaniz. Should move away from the fighting over personal than ideological. In a difficult financial situation within a complex socio-economic situation should generate ideas rather than political bitterness much with so little visibility. Something
utopians are my thoughts. Utopian in the same models as the city that all parties have submitted to the debate. It takes more common sense.
0 comments:
Post a Comment