The "Sixth Sense" by Eva Defior led last week to make a brilliant reflection on maneuvers D. Angel Lacueva within the PSOE. On Tuesday it had begun as an opinion piece became a first-class news and information contrasted with data on the cumulative crisis for over twenty five years within the PSOE in Alcaniz.
But I agree with Angel Lacueva call Machiavellian. Neither Angel Lacueva could reach more or less Niccolo Machiavelli. And Machiavelli said in his Speeches on the first decade of Livy that "men are infamous destroy religions, those that dissipate the Kingdoms and Republics," which I use as example to demonstrate the limited horizons Alcañizano socialist leader. He
when he joined the coalition proved to be a bull in a junkyard changing everything at will. Had it been a good follower of Machiavelli would know that "Whoever wants to reform some outdated institutions in a free city should keep for at least the shadow of the old ways"
configurator But Machiavelli as the pillars of the modern state was still very clear to describe relations with the citizens of Prince, Machiavelli said: "A priíncipe due mainly live with their own, so do not change their behavior." It also stated "That the prince attempt As it does prevent heinous and worthy of contempt "Have you done any of this our Senator?
Do you see any similarity between Machiavelli and Angel Lacueva? Machiavelli focused part of their thesis policies in the power of fortune. Said of it: "When the fortune want that large events, know how, choosing a great man. When you want to ruin is always the person who ruined everything. "
fortunate I am convinced that Senator Lacueva found the right person to destroy socialism in Alcaniz.
Machiavellianism The misinterpretation of the great leaders led to the destruction of your project. If Napoleon, a great statesman, failed in his interpretation of works by Niccolo Machiavelli, Could we expect from Angel Lacueva the correctness of interpretation of the work of Machiavelli?
Machiavelli's epitaph gives me the conclusion to my article: "As great man of no praise is adequate."
But I agree with Angel Lacueva call Machiavellian. Neither Angel Lacueva could reach more or less Niccolo Machiavelli. And Machiavelli said in his Speeches on the first decade of Livy that "men are infamous destroy religions, those that dissipate the Kingdoms and Republics," which I use as example to demonstrate the limited horizons Alcañizano socialist leader. He
when he joined the coalition proved to be a bull in a junkyard changing everything at will. Had it been a good follower of Machiavelli would know that "Whoever wants to reform some outdated institutions in a free city should keep for at least the shadow of the old ways"
configurator But Machiavelli as the pillars of the modern state was still very clear to describe relations with the citizens of Prince, Machiavelli said: "A priíncipe due mainly live with their own, so do not change their behavior." It also stated "That the prince attempt As it does prevent heinous and worthy of contempt "Have you done any of this our Senator?
Do you see any similarity between Machiavelli and Angel Lacueva? Machiavelli focused part of their thesis policies in the power of fortune. Said of it: "When the fortune want that large events, know how, choosing a great man. When you want to ruin is always the person who ruined everything. "
fortunate I am convinced that Senator Lacueva found the right person to destroy socialism in Alcaniz.
Machiavellianism The misinterpretation of the great leaders led to the destruction of your project. If Napoleon, a great statesman, failed in his interpretation of works by Niccolo Machiavelli, Could we expect from Angel Lacueva the correctness of interpretation of the work of Machiavelli?
Machiavelli's epitaph gives me the conclusion to my article: "As great man of no praise is adequate."
0 comments:
Post a Comment